The bottleneck of China's commercial vehicle development
As Chinese commercial vehicle manufacturers eagerly expanded into the global market, they quickly encountered a series of strict regulatory barriers that slowed their progress. Industry insiders point out that the movement of China's commercial vehicle market is closely tied to the government's macroeconomic policies, including taxation, fees, overloading regulations, and emissions standards. These policies can directly influence the sales volume of commercial vehicles.
Kevin Crumbo and Jeff Hallos from Rich American Consulting Co., Ltd. highlighted the differences in policy environments between China and the U.S. They noted that one major challenge for Chinese manufacturers is meeting the stringent emission standards set by Europe, Japan, and North America. Compared to these regions, China’s environmental regulations have lagged significantly. This means that Chinese export vehicles must be equipped with costly technologies to meet higher international standards, which undermines the cost advantages of large-scale production.
For instance, when China reached Euro III emission standards in 2007, Europe had already transitioned to Euro IV. By 2010, when China met Euro IV, Europe was moving toward Euro VI. Another key issue is fuel quality: China’s diesel has sulfur levels exceeding 500 ppm, while U.S. diesel is at 50 ppm and European standards are even lower. High sulfur content damages particulate filters, requiring larger and more advanced filters for the Chinese market.
Lois Boyd of Tenneco’s commercial vehicle division remarked that she hadn’t seen any significant efforts from China to improve fuel quality by 2010. Truck manufacturers must adapt their engine strategies based on the fuel quality and emission rules of each export market. If they target Europe or the U.S., engine technology becomes critical.
Although China lags behind the West in clean emissions, it still holds an advantage over many other emerging exporters. Meanwhile, Western automakers have been investing in alternative fuels like hybrid and fuel cell technology for over a decade. At the 2007 Shanghai Auto Show, such models were showcased as prototypes but not yet commercially available.
With stricter emission standards and fuel economy requirements, Western companies are forced to seek alternatives. BMW, GM, and DaimlerChrysler are collaborating on hybrid vehicles, while GM and Toyota are working together on fuel cell research. Chinese companies are also engaging in R&D partnerships with universities and government institutions, though there is less collaboration among private firms. However, with strong government support, cooperation in this area is expected to grow.
Xu Liankuan of Zonda Group emphasized the need for Chinese automakers to unite and share resources in product development and R&D to enhance their global competitiveness. Despite economic growth and investment, many Chinese companies face challenges beyond finance.
Huo from Beiqi Futian noted that while the government supports independent brands and intellectual property, there are no clear regulations yet. Additionally, the focus on passenger cars often overlooks commercial vehicles. He suggested that tax incentives, such as export rebates and reduced taxes on R&D and equipment, could better encourage innovation in the sector.
He also criticized the complex bureaucratic procedures for vehicle approval, comparing it to getting multiple blood tests for a single result. The process can take up to three months, making it inefficient and costly.
Du Weidong of Qingling Automobile Group pointed out that fuel efficiency measures may negatively impact local SUV manufacturers using larger engines. A new tax structure increased the tax on 2.4-liter SUV engines from 5% to 12%, and the lack of differentiation between diesel and gasoline further complicates things.
Tong Dongcheng of Dongfeng Motor said that profit margins are returning to normal, and only innovative companies will survive in the long run. Roman Mathyssek of Global Vision warned that increasing consumer purchasing power will put pressure on profit margins.
Eric Lee, speaking on behalf of Jack Zheng from Fiat Group China, emphasized that Chinese suppliers must add more engineering value to their products. While some local suppliers have become international players, they still represent only a small portion of parts purchases.
Fiat’s Iveco subsidiary has formed joint ventures with Nanjing Automobile Group, and its component companies Teksid and Magnetti are also active in China. As the industry continues to evolve, collaboration and adaptation will remain crucial for success.
Steel Roller,Carbon Steel Cooling Roller,Vacuum Adsorption Roller,Alloy Steel Conductive Roller
Jiangyin Mingda Rubber Roller Co,Ltd , https://www.mingdaroller.com